REACH Back on the (Distant?) Horizon
Brussels Delays Major Chemicals Reform but Prepares Smaller Moves
European chemicals policy has once again reached a point the industry knows all too well: everyone agrees the system needs change, yet in an age of geopolitical instability, no one is eager to open the largest drawer labeled REACH.
Recent statements from representatives of the European Parliament and the European Commission suggest that a full revision of the EU’s flagship chemicals regulation may not take place within the next year or two, as previously expected. Instead, Brussels appears increasingly inclined toward a more pragmatic solution: targeted adjustments that are technically faster, politically easier, but far less spectacular.
This is an important signal for manufacturers, importers, distributors, and all companies operating across the chemicals supply chain. Rather than one sweeping reform that would reshape the rules of the game, the market may instead receive a series of smaller changes spread over time. For now, we should not expect a revolution. For many companies, that may come as a relief. At the same time, the longer-term horizon remains uncertain, making strategic planning more difficult.
REACH – A Powerful but Increasingly Heavy System
For years, REACH has remained the cornerstone of Europe’s approach to chemical safety. It is one of the most comprehensive regulatory systems in the world, covering substance registration, risk assessment, authorisation, and restrictions on use.
The challenge, however, is that a framework designed nearly two decades ago must now respond to an entirely new reality: digitalisation, cost pressure on industry, rising competition from Chinese products on the European market, the Green Deal, the PFAS issue, Europe’s raw material security, and growing public expectations regarding health and environmental protection.
The European Commission has been announcing a REACH revision for several years, yet the timeline continues to move. In the EU’s “Legislative Train,” the project still appears as an announced but not yet presented initiative. In political language, that usually means the issue is alive, but decisions are still missing.
If Not Major Reform, Then Smaller Steps
In recent weeks, one word has appeared more and more often: comitology — the committee procedure that allows the European Commission to introduce certain implementing or technical changes without launching the full legislative process.
To businesses, the term may sound bureaucratic, but in practice it means the possibility of correcting selected parts of the system more quickly.
This is the route Brussels is now considering as a realistic alternative to major reform. It cannot rewrite REACH from scratch, but it can improve parts of the annexes, procedures, administrative requirements, and operational mechanisms.
For companies, this is both good news and difficult news. Good, because some improvements could arrive sooner. Difficult, because the absence of comprehensive reform means continued operation within a system many market participants consider overly complex, costly, and slow.
The Chemicals Omnibus Shows Europe’s New Direction
To understand where chemicals regulation is heading, it is worth looking beyond REACH itself. In parallel, the EU is advancing the so-called chemicals omnibus — a simplification package covering, among other areas, CLP, cosmetics, and fertilisers legislation. Work in the European Parliament has taken place in a tense atmosphere, with votes postponed due to a lack of political agreement.
This is a symptom of a broader trend. Europe is speaking more and more about industrial competitiveness, deregulation, economic resilience, and reducing administrative burdens. That means chemicals policy is no longer just a discussion about toxicology and public health. It has become part of a wider debate about whether European industry can compete with the United States and Asia.
For the chemicals sector, this is a fundamental shift. Just a few years ago, the dominant language was stricter regulation. Today, the language of balance is heard more often: safety, yes — but not at the expense of industrial strength. Some of the loudest voices making this case come from major economies such as Germany.
Polarisation Instead of Consensus
Commission officials openly admit that the EU decision-making process is becoming increasingly polarised. Disputes are no longer limited to economic interests, but now also concern attitudes toward science, risk assessment, and the appropriate level of state intervention.
As a result, even relatively technical chemicals files are turning into political battlegrounds.
Meanwhile, pressure is not disappearing. Environmental organisations warn that delays in restricting hazardous substances are costing Europe real emissions reductions and exposing people to unnecessary risks. They point, among other things, to prolonged work on the roadmap for introducing chemical product restrictions and the slow pace of certain bans.
Industry, on the other hand, argues that additional obligations are falling on a sector already burdened by energy prices, inflation, and global competition.
Between these two narratives, the Commission is trying to find a workable middle ground.
Brussels Has Not Abandoned REACH — It Is Simply Not Ready
Perhaps the most accurate summary of the current situation is this: Brussels has not abandoned REACH reform, but it is not politically ready to deliver it in full.
Instead of one grand opening, it is choosing a series of smaller decisions.
For the chemicals market, this means a period of uncertainty — but also a period of preparation. Because when the major revision finally arrives, it will come to a system already partly rebuilt, and to companies that have learned how to operate in a world of permanent change.
Contact
ANY QUESTIONS?
Contact us